Impact of selected clinical pharmacy services on medication safety and prescription cost of patients attending a selected primary healthcare setting: a translational experience from a resource-limited country.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The impact of clinical pharmacy (CP) services on primary healthcare (PH) is less well studied in resource-limited countries. We aimed to evaluate the effect of selected CP services on medication safety and prescription cost at a PH setting in Sri Lanka. STUDY DESIGN: Patients attending a PH medical clinic with medications prescribed at the same visit were selected using systematic random sampling. A medication history was obtained and medications were reconciled and reviewed using four standard references. Drug-related problems (DRPs) were identified and categorised, and severities were assessed using the National Coordinating Council Medication Error Reporting and Prevention Index. Acceptance of DRPs by prescribers was assessed. Prescription cost reduction due to CP interventions was assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test at 5% significance. RESULTS: Among 150 patients approached, 51 were recruited. Nearly half (58.8%) reported financial difficulties in purchasing medications. DRPs identified were 86. Of them, 13.9% (12 of 86) DRPs were identified when taking a medication history (administration errors (7 of 12); self-prescribing errors (5 of 12)), 2.3% (2 of 86) during reconciliation, and 83.7% (72 of 86) during medication reviewing (wrong indication (18 of 72), wrong strength (14 of 72), wrong frequency (19 of 72), wrong route of administration (2 of 72), duplication (3 of 72), other (16 of 72)). Most DRPs (55.8%) reached the patient, but did not cause harm. Prescribers accepted 65.8% (56 of 86) DRPs identified by researchers. The individual prescription cost reduced significantly due to CP interventions (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing CP services could potentially improve medication safety at a PH level even in resource-limited settings. Prescription cost could be significantly reduced for patients with financial difficulties in consultation with prescribers.

Clinical and economic impacts of explicit tools detecting prescribing errors: A systematic review.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Many explicit tools have been developed to reduce prescribing errors and ensure patients' safety. The impact of explicit tools is not well studied. The objective of this study was (a) to conduct a systematic review of systematic reviews listing explicit tools developed to detect prescribing errors and (b) to assess their impact on clinical and economic outcomes. METHODS: This project includes two related parts. First, a systematic review of systematic reviews listing explicit tools dedicated to geriatrics or internal medicine was performed to develop an exhaustive list of explicit tools. Then, using the list compiled in the first step, a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT) assessing clinical or economic impacts of tools was performed to evaluate their usefulness. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The systematic review of systematic reviews identified 49 explicit tools. The systematic review of RCT, using one or more of the 49 explicit tools, identified 5 RCT using explicit tools as intervention (3 STOPP/START and 2 FORTA RCT). The 5 studies evaluated clinical impacts with 3 RCT identifying significant clinical impacts (falls, activities of daily living and/or adverse drug reactions) and 2 STOPP/START RCT identifying significant economic impacts. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The systematic review of RCT showed that explicit tools can have some effect in improving patients' safety. Further studies are warranted to better characterize their clinical and economic impact.

Clinical pharmacist interventions in managing Key Monitoring Drugs in China.

OBJECTIVE: Drug-related problems (DRPs) are common in hospitalized patients receiving Key Monitoring Drugs. Clinical pharmacy services have the potential to minimize drug-related harm and improve patient care. The aim of this study is to standardize the clinical application of Key Monitoring Drugs and reduce drug-related problems (DRPs) and associated costs, using clinical pharmacist interventions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical pharmacists formulate management measures for Key Monitoring Drugs using evidence-based medicine and analyze the DRPs of Key Monitoring Drugs in China at the Shandong Provincial Third Hospital over a period of five years, from 2015 to 2019. RESULTS: In 2019, the total cost of the use of Key Monitoring Drugs decreased by 10.12 million CNY, in comparison with the cost in 2015. The proportion of revenue generated from Key Monitoring Drugs also decreased by 11.49% compared with 2015. In addition, the cost per capita of Key Monitoring Drugs has gradually decreased; this resulted in a saving of 580.07 CNY per capita in 2019 compared with 2015. Over this time, the DRPs associated with Key Monitoring Drugs decreased by 45.50%. Through administrative intervention, prescription review, information management, and pharmaco-economic evaluation, a scientific management system for Key Monitoring Drugs has been established over this time, which standardizes the use of Key Monitoring Drugs and reduces their associated costs. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical pharmacists' interventions can assist in the early detection of drug-related problems associated with Key Monitoring Drugs and prevent any resulting harm to patients.

Safety, time and cost evaluation of automated and semi-automated drug distribution systems in hospitals: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review automated and semi-automated drug distribution systems (DDSs) in hospitals and to evaluate their effectiveness on medication safety, time and costs of medication care. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE Ovid, Scopus, CINAHL and EMB Reviews covering the period 2005 to May 2016. Studies were included if they (1) concerned technologies used in the drug distribution and administration process in acute care hospitals and (2) reported medication safety, time and cost-related outcomes. RESULTS: Key outcomes, conclusions and recommendations of the included studies (n=30) were categorised according to the dispensing method: decentralised (n=19 studies), centralised (n=6) or hybrid system (n=5). Patient safety improved (n=27) with automation, and reduction in medication errors was found in all three systems. Centralised and decentralised systems were reported to support clinical pharmacy practice in hospitals. The impact of the medication distribution system on time allocation such as labour time, staffing workload or changes in work process was explored in the majority of studies (n=24). Six studies explored economic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: No medication distribution system was found to be better than another in terms of outcomes assessed in the studies included in the systematic review. All DDSs improved medication safety and quality of care, mainly by decreasing medication errors. However, many error types still remained-for example, prescribing errors. Centralised and hybrid systems saved more time than a decentralised system. Costs of medication care were reduced in decentralised systems mainly in high-expense units. However, no evidence was shown that implementation of decentralised systems in small units would save costs. More comparable evidence on the benefits and costs of decentralised and hybrid systems should be available. Changes in processes due to a new DDS may create new medication safety risks; to minimise these risks, training and reallocation of staff resources are needed.

Incidence and prevalence of intravenous medication errors in the UK: a systematic review.

Objectives: Medication error is the most common type of medical error, and intravenous medicines are at a higher risk as they are complex to prepare and administer. The WHO advocates a 50% reduction of harmful medication errors by 2022, but there is a lack of data in the UK that accurately estimates the true rate of intravenous medication errors. This study aimed to estimate the number of intravenous medication errors per 1000 administrations in the UK National Health Service and their associated economic costs. The rate of errors in prescribing, preparation and administration, and rate of different types of errors were also extracted. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane central register of clinical trials, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database and the Health Technology Appraisals Database were searched from inception to July 2017. Epidemiological studies to determine the incidence of intravenous medication errors set wholly or in part in the UK were included. 228 studies were identified, and after screening, eight papers were included, presenting 2576 infusions. Data were reviewed and extracted by a team of five reviewers with discrepancies in data extraction agreed by consensus. Results: Five of eight studies used a comparable denominator, and these data were pooled to determine a weighted mean incidence of 101 intravenous medication errors per 1000 administrations (95% CI 84 to 121). Three studies presented prevalence data but these were based on spontaneous reports only; therefore it did not support a true estimate. 32.1% (95% CI 30.6% to 33.7%) of intravenous medication errors were administration errors and 'wrong rate' errors accounted for 57.9% (95% CI 54.7% to 61.1%) of these. Conclusion: Intravenous medication errors in the UK are common, with half these of errors related to medication administration. National strategies are aimed at mitigating errors in prescribing and preparation. It is now time to focus on reducing administration error, particularly wrong rate errors.

Cost-effectiveness of infusion pumps to reduce errors in a Pediatric ICU.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze cost-effectiveness and to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the use of infusion pumps with drug library to reduce errors in intravenous drug administration in pediatric and neonatal patients in Intensive Care Units. METHODS: Mathematical modeling for economic analysis of the decision tree type. The base case was composed of reference and alternative settings. The target population was neonates and pediatric patients hospitalized in Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Units, comprising a cohort of 15,034 patients. The cost estimate was based on the bottom-up and top-down approaches. RESULTS: The decision tree, after RollBack, showed that the infusion pump with drug library may be the best strategy to avoid errors in intravenous drugs administration. CONCLUSION: The analysis revealed that the conventional pump, although it has the lowest cost, also has lower effectiveness.

Implementing technologies to prevent medication errors at a high-complexity hospital: analysis of cost and results.

OBJECTIVE: To calculate the cost and assess the results on implementing technological resources that can prevent medication errors. METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive-exploratory, quantitative study (2007-2015), in the model of case study at a hospital in the Brazilian Southeastern Region. The direct cost of each technology was calculated in the drug chain. Technological efficacy was observed from the reported series of the indicator incidence of medication errors. RESULTS: Thirteen technologies were identified to prevent medication errors. The average cost of these technologies per year in the prescription stage was R$ 3.251.757,00; in dispensing, R$ 2.979.397,10; and in administration, R$ 4.028.351,00. The indicator of medication error incidence decreased by 97.5%, gradually between 2007 to 2015, ranging from 2.4% to 0.06%. CONCLUSION: The average cost per year of the organization to implement preventive technologies in the drug chain totaled up R$ 10.259.505,10. There was an average investment/year of R$ 55,72 per patient and its association with smaller indicator of incidence of medication errors confirms a satisfactory result in this reported series regarding such investment.

Multicenter study to evaluate the benefits of technology-assisted workflow on i.v. room efficiency, costs, and safety.

PURPOSE: The benefits of technology-assisted workflow (TAWF) compared with manual workflow (non-TAWF) on i.v. room efficiency, costs, and safety at hospitals with more than 200 beds are evaluated. METHODS: Eight hospitals across the United States (4 with TAWF, 4 without) were evaluated, and the characteristics of medication errors and frequency of each error type were measured across the different institutions. The average turnaround time per workflow step and the cost to prepare each compounded sterile preparation (CSP) were also calculated, using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The TAWF hospital sites detected errors at a significantly higher rate (3.13%) than the non-TAWF hospital sites (0.22%) (p < 0.05). The top error reporting category for the TAWF sites was incorrect medication (63.30%), while the top error reporting category for the non-TAWF sites was incorrect medication volume (18.34%). Use of TAWF was associated with a preparation time decrease of 2.82 min/CSP, a compounding time decrease of 2.94 min/CSP, and a decrease in overall cost to prepare of $1.60/CSP. CONCLUSION: The use of TAWF in the i.v. room was associated with the detection of 14 times more errors than the use of non-TAWF, demonstrating different frequency of error in the results. TAWF also led to a faster preparation time that had a lower cost for preparation.

Medication related litigation in Ireland: A 6-year review.

AIMS: The primary aims of the study were to identify those medications most frequently associated with clinical litigation in Ireland and to quantify the cost of such litigation. Secondary aims were to identify where in the medication-use process claims were most likely to arise, the medication incident types involved and the primary injury alleged. METHODS: The National Incident Management System (NIMS) for incident and claims management was searched to identify all medication-related claims finalised from 2011 to 2016 (inclusive). The physical case files were obtained and additional data not available on NIMS was extracted in order to build a detailed picture of the incident and subsequent claim. RESULTS: The search identified 79 relevant claims, of which 48 closed with a payment to the plaintiff. These 48 claims involved 54 medications. Medication groups identified included general anaesthetics (n = 7), opioids (n = 6), penicillins, antithrombotics and local anaesthetics (all n = 5). The errors alleged occurred exclusively at the administration (58%) and prescribing (42%) stages of the medication-use process. Medication incident types included wrong dose/strength (n = 17), wrong drug (n = 7) and adverse drug reaction (n = 6). The most commonly pleaded primary injuries were allergic reaction (n = 9), deterioration in clinical status (n = 9) and post-traumatic stress disorder (n = 8). The median total cost of these claims was €60 991, including median damages of €33 858. CONCLUSIONS: This study links data on medication incidents, actual harm to patients and litigation costs. Thus, it presents a comprehensive picture of the consequences of medication error.

Cost-effectiveness of infusion pumps to reduce errors in a Pediatric ICU / El costo-efectividad de bombas de infusión para la reducción de errores en una UTI Pediátrica / Custo-efetividade de bombas de infusão para a redução de erros em uma UTI Pediátrica

ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze cost-effectiveness and to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the use of infusion pumps with drug library to reduce errors in intravenous drug administration in pediatric and neonatal patients in Intensive Care Units. Methods: Mathematical modeling for economic analysis of the decision tree type. The base case was composed of reference and alternative settings. The target population was neonates and pediatric patients hospitalized in Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Units, comprising a cohort of 15,034 patients. The cost estimate was based on the bottom-up and top-down approaches. Results: The decision tree, after RollBack, showed that the infusion pump with drug library may be the best strategy to avoid errors in intravenous drugs administration. Conclusion: The analysis revealed that the conventional pump, although it has the lowest cost, also has lower effectiveness.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Analizar el costo-efectividad y calcular la razón de costo-efectividad incremental del uso de bombas de infusión con una biblioteca de fármacos para reducir errores en la administración de medicamentos por vía intravenosa, en pacientes pediátricos y neonatales en unidades de terapia intensiva. Método: Modelaje matemático para el análisis económico, del tipo árbol de decisión. El caso base se compone de escenarios de referencia y alternativo. La población objetivo fueron pacientes neonatos y pediátricos internados en unidades de terapia intensiva pediátrica y neonatal, componiendo una cohorte de 15.034 pacientes. La estimación de costos se basó en los enfoques bottom-up y top-down. Resultados: El árbol de decisión, después de Roll Back, mostró que la bomba de infusión con biblioteca de fármacos puede ser la mejor estrategia para evitar errores en la administración de medicamentos intravenosos. Conclusión: El análisis reveló que la bomba convencional, aunque tiene el menor costo, tiene también menor efectividad.

RESUMO Objetivo: Analisar o custo-efetividade e calcular a razão de custo-efetividade incremental do uso de bombas de infusão com biblioteca de fármacos para reduzir erros na administração de medicamento pela via intravenosa, em pacientes pediátricos e neonatais em Unidades de Terapia Intensiva. Método: Modelagem matemática para análise econômica, do tipo árvore de decisão. O caso-base foi composto pelos cenários de referência e alternativo. A população alvo foram pacientes neonatos e pediátricos internados em Unidades de Terapia Intensiva pediátrica e neonatal, compondo uma coorte de 15.034 pacientes. A estimativa de custos foi baseada nas abordagens bottom-up e top-down. Resultados: A árvore de decisão, após RollBack, mostrou que a bomba de infusão com biblioteca de fármacos pode ser a melhor estratégia para evitar erros na administração de medicamentos intravenosos. Conclusão: A análise revelou que a bomba convencional, embora tenha o menor custo, tem também menor efetividade.

Economic Outcomes Associated with Safety Interventions by a Pharmacist-Adjudicated Prior Authorization Consult Service.

BACKGROUND: The establishment of a formulary management system ensures that health care professionals work together in an integrated patient care process to promote clinically sound, safe, and cost-effective medication therapy. Pharmacists have a foundational role within this system. A pharmacist-adjudicated prior authorization drug request (PADR) consult service has the potential to optimize drug therapy by decreasing medication misuse, minimizing adverse drug events (ADEs), and preventing medication errors. OBJECTIVES: To (a) determine cost avoidance associated with pharmacist-adjudicated PADR safety interventions within the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System and (b) evaluate cost savings associated with pharmacist-adjudicated PADRs not approved due to a safety intervention, evaluate cost avoidance and direct cost savings based on clinical specialty of pharmacist adjudicating PADR, and characterize severity of avoided ADEs. METHODS: Pharmacist-adjudicated PADRs not approved between July 1, 2016, and June 30, 2017, because of safety interventions were retrospectively reviewed. Cost avoidance was determined by multiplying the probability of ADE occurrence in the absence of PADR safety intervention by the estimated cost avoided based on the type of intervention. Direct cost savings was calculated by totaling the cost of requested medications not approved for each PADR and subtracting the cost of recommended alternative therapies and cost of pharmacist PADR review. All potential ADEs avoided were reviewed by a panel of 3 clinical pharmacists to validate ADE classification and ADE probability and severity scores. Descriptive statistics were used for all analyses. RESULTS: Of the 910 PADRs that were not approved during the study period, 96 met inclusion criteria. Pharmacist-adjudicated PADR safety interventions resulted in a total cost avoidance of $24,485.34 (mean = $255.06) and a direct cost savings of $288,695.63 (mean = $3,007.25). The practice settings of anticoagulation and infectious diseases PADRs resulted in the largest contribution to cost avoidance and direct cost savings, respectively. Prevented ADEs were classified as major for 64.6% of the PADRs. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacist-adjudicated PADR safety reviews resulted in substantial economic benefit and prevention of major ADEs. This analysis supports the pharmacist's role in a formulary management system to optimize medication therapy. DISCLOSURES: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for profit sectors. The authors have nothing to disclose.

Metodologias utilizadas para o cálculo do custo do erro de medicação: uma análise crítica / Methodologies used to calculate the cost of the medication error: a critical analysis / Metodologías utilizadas para el cálculo del costo del error de medicación: un análisis crítico

Introdução: A terapêutica medicamentosa é uma prática multiprofissional em instituições de saúde. Erros são inerentes a ela e podem acontecer em qualquer etapa (prescrição, dispensação e administração de medicação) da cadeia medicamentosa, podendo gerar custos à instituição e sistema de saúde. Objetivo: apresentar uma administração de medicação) da cadeia medicamentosa, podendo gerar custos à instituição e sistema de saúde...(AU)

Introduction: Drug therapy is a multiprofessional practice in health institutions. Errors are inherent to it and can happen at any stage (prescription, dispensation and administration of medication) in the drug chain, which can generate costs to the institution and health system. Objective: to present a medication administration) of the drug chain, which may generate costs to the institution and health system ... (AU)

Introducción: la farmacoterapia es una práctica multiprofesional en instituciones de salud. Los errores son inherentes y pueden ocurrir en cualquier etapa (prescripción, dispensación y administración de medicamentos) en la cadena de medicamentos, lo que puede generar costos para la institución y el sistema de salud. Objetivo: presentar una administración de medicamentos) de la cadena de medicamentos, lo que puede generar costos para la institución y el sistema de salud ... (AU)

Impact of drug storage systems: a quasi-experimental study with and without an automated-drug dispensing cabinet.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the costs and benefits of an automated-drug dispensing cabinet (ADC) versus traditional floor stock storage (TFSS). DESIGN: A quasi-experimental multicenter study conducted during 2015. SETTING: A teaching hospital (814 beds) equipped with 43 ADCs and a not-for-profit teaching hospital (643 beds) equipped with 38 TFSS systems, in Paris, France. PARTICIPANTS: All the wards of the two hospitals were included in the study. INTERVENTION(S): ADC versus TFSS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): A composite outcome composed of cost and benefits. RESULTS: The total cost with payback period was substantially higher for the ADCs (574 006€ for 41 ADCs) than TFSS (190 305€ for 30 TFSS systems). The mean number of costly drugs and units were significantly higher for ADCs (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the mean number of overall drugs and units. There were significantly fewer urgent global deliveries with ADCs than TFSS units. Nurses' satisfaction with ADCs was high and the prevalence of medication process errors related to ADCs was low. No event due to storage errors was reported for ADCs and nine events were reported for TFSS units. On the contrary, informatic-related events increased with the use of ADCs, as expected. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, ADCs are well-established in wards and are particularly appreciated by nurses. A significant difference in the initial investment cost was confirmed, but it must be adjusted over time. This difference is offset in the long-term by gains in preparation time and fewer medication process errors, securing the medication process.

Implementing technologies to prevent medication errors at a high-complexity hospital: analysis of cost and results / Implantação de tecnologias para prevenção de erros de medicação em hospital de alta complexidade: análise de custos e resultados

ABSTRACT Objective: To calculate the cost and assess the results on implementing technological resources that can prevent medication errors. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive-exploratory, quantitative study (2007-2015), in the model of case study at a hospital in the Brazilian Southeastern Region. The direct cost of each technology was calculated in the drug chain. Technological efficacy was observed from the reported series of the indicator incidence of medication errors. Results: Thirteen technologies were identified to prevent medication errors. The average cost of these technologies per year in the prescription stage was R$ 3.251.757,00; in dispensing, R$ 2.979.397,10; and in administration, R$ 4.028.351,00. The indicator of medication error incidence decreased by 97.5%, gradually between 2007 to 2015, ranging from 2.4% to 0.06%. Conclusion: The average cost per year of the organization to implement preventive technologies in the drug chain totaled up R$ 10.259.505,10. There was an average investment/year of R$ 55,72 per patient and its association with smaller indicator of incidence of medication errors confirms a satisfactory result in this reported series regarding such investment.

RESUMO Objetivo: Calcular o custo e avaliar os resultados da implantação de tecnologias que podem prevenir o erro de medicação. Métodos: Estudo descritivo-exploratório, retrospectivo (2007-2015), quantitativo, nos moldes de estudo de caso em instituição hospitalar da Região Sudeste do Brasil. Calculou-se o custo direto de cada tecnologia na cadeia medicamentosa. A eficácia das tecnologias foi verificada a partir da série histórica do indicador de incidência de erro de medicação. Resultados: Para prevenção do erro de medicação, foram identificadas 13 tecnologias. O custo médio/ano dessas tecnologias na etapa de prescrição foi R$ 3.251.757,00; na dispensação, R$ 2.979.397,10; e na administração, R$ 4.028.351,00. O indicador de incidência de erro de medicação apresentou queda de 97,5%, de forma gradual entre 2007 a 2015, variando de 2,4% a 0,06%. Conclusão: O custo médio/ano para a instituição das tecnologias preventivas na cadeia medicamentosa totalizou R$ 10.259.505,10. Houve investimento médio/ano de R$ 55,72 por paciente. Sua associação com a redução do indicador de incidência de erros de medicação na série histórica apresentada reitera um resultado satisfatório para tal investimento.

The national cost of adverse drug events resulting from inappropriate medication-related alert overrides in the United States.

Objective: To estimate the national cost of ADEs resulting from inappropriate medication-related alert overrides in the U.S. inpatient setting. Materials and Methods: We used three different regression models (Basic, Model 1, Model 2) with model inputs taken from the medical literature. A random sample of 40 990 adult inpatients at the Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) in Boston with a total of 1 639 294 medication orders was taken. We extrapolated BWH medication orders using 2014 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) data. Results: Using three regression models, we estimated that 29.7 million adult inpatient discharges in 2014 resulted in between 1.02 billion and 1.07 billion medication orders, which in turn generated between 75.1 million and 78.8 million medication alerts, respectively. Taking the basic model (78.8 million), we estimated that 5.5 million medication-related alerts might have been inappropriately overridden, resulting in approximately 196 600 ADEs nationally. This was projected to cost between $871 million and $1.8 billion for treating preventable ADEs. We also estimated that clinicians and pharmacists would have jointly spent 175 000 hours responding to 78.8 million alerts with an opportunity cost of $16.9 million. Discussion and Conclusion: These data suggest that further optimization of hospitals computerized provider order entry systems and their associated clinical decision support is needed and would result in substantial savings. We have erred on the side of caution in developing this range, taking two conservative cost estimates for a preventable ADE that did not include malpractice or litigation costs, or costs of injuries to patients.

A Quality Initiative: A System-Wide Reduction in Serious Medication Events Through Targeted Simulation Training.

INTRODUCTION: Medication administration events (MAEs) are a great concern to the healthcare industry, because they are both common and costly. Pediatric patients pose unique challenges to healthcare systems, particularly regarding the safety of medication administration. Our objectives were to improve adherence to best practices, decrease MAEs, and decrease cost related to error reduction rates by implementing a scenario-based simulation training program for frontline nursing staff in the general care units, emergency departments, and intensive care units within our institution. METHODS: Children's simulation center in conjunction with the medication safety workgroup developed a 2-hour target-specific simulation-based training. This quality initiative focused on implementation of a MAE bundle that included the following three elements: The Five Rights, MedZone, and Independent Double Check. Adherence to the use of bundle elements was monitored via bedside auditing for 18 months after the intervention. This audit was accomplished using an institution-wide MAE reporting system. The 2012 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Kids' Inpatient Database and 2014 Children's Hospital Association, Pediatric Health Information System databases were used to estimate cost impact. RESULTS: A total of 1434 nurses from our intensive care units, emergency departments, and general care inpatient units participated in simulation training. Nursing adherence to the MAE bundle in the 18-month period after simulation increased by 33%, from January 2014 to June 2015. Medication administration event monitoring during the preintervention, intervention, and postintervention periods demonstrated a decrease in error rate from 2.5 events per month to 0.86 events per month This error reduction correlated to an estimated charge savings of $165,000 to $255,000 and a cost impact of $90,000 to $130,000 per year. CONCLUSIONS: Target-specific simulation-based training on a large scale has improved adherence with best practice guidelines and has led to a significant reduction in MAEs.

Cost-utility analysis of an intervention designed to reduce the critical handling error of insufficient inspiratory effort.

OBJECTIVES: Up to 70-80% of patients use inhalers incorrectly. Dry-powder inhalers (DPIs) require forceful inhalation for optimal delivery, and approximately 40% of Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA)-defined Step-3+ patients inhale corticosteroid and long-acting beta-agonist through DPIs. The CRITIKAL study (Price et al. in J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 5:1071-e9-1081-e9, 2017) found a statistically significant association between 'insufficient inspiratory effort' error and increased risk of uncontrolled asthma and hospitalisation-requiring exacerbations. This paper explores the cost-effectiveness of an error-targeted intervention. METHODS: A probabilistic Markov cost-utility model simulated patients transitioning between controlled and uncontrolled health states over one year. Odds ratios (ORs, from the CRITIKAL study) of a patient having uncontrolled asthma conditional on making the error were applied to baseline transition probabilities sourced from the literature, both indirectly via an adjustment formula (Zhang et al. in JAMA 280:1690-1691, 1998) and directly by assuming OR approximates relative risk (RR). The analysis explored complete/partial eradication of the error when the intervention was priced to match comparators, as well as impact of indirect costs based on lost/reduced productivity. RESULTS: The intervention dominated both DPI comparators over one year, with direct cost savings of £45/£86 with 0.0053/0.0102 additional quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and had the highest probability of being cost-effective at a £20,000/QALY threshold. Key factors driving variance were weekly utilities per state and RR of moving to an uncontrolled state. CONCLUSION: The analysis demonstrated the economic and societal costs of 'insufficient inspiratory effort' and potential economic benefits of introducing an effective intervention to reduce/eradicate this error. Further research should assess the economic impact of other handling errors.

Impact of the clinical pharmacist interventions on prevention of pharmacotherapy related problems in the paediatric intensive care unit.

Background Problems related to pharmacotherapy are common in patients admitted to the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and are associated with increased healthcare costs. Data on the impact of clinical pharmacist interventions to prevent pharmacotherapy-related problems and to minimize costs in the PICU are limited. Objectives To evaluate the number and type of clinical pharmacist interventions in the PICU and to determine cost savings associated with them. Setting a ten bed PICU of a tertiary-care university hospital in Brazil. Method This was a prospective, observational study conducted over 1-year. The Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) tool was applied at the beginning of the study to assess drug-related risks in the PICU and to guide clinical pharmacist interventions. Main outcome measure Number and type of clinical pharmacist interventions and healthcare-related costs. Results One hundred sixty-two children were followed-up by the clinical pharmacist and 1586 prescriptions were evaluated; pharmacotherapy-related problems were identified in 12.4% of them. Sixteen of 75 failure modes identified by FMEA were potentially reduced by the clinical pharmacist interventions. There were 197 interventions with a cost saving of R$ 15,118.73 (US$ 4828.00). Clinical pharmacist interventions were related to drug interaction and therapeutic monitoring (34.5%), drug selection (22.3%), dosing and frequency (16.8%), prescription (13.2%) and administration (13.2%). Ninety-seven per cent of the clinical pharmacist interventions were accepted by the medical team. The interventions with larger cost savings were related to administration (39%). Conclusion The clinical pharmacist interventions minimized the risks of pharmacotherapy-related problems and contributed to the reduction of costs associated with medical prescription.

Patient safety and the value of pharmaceutical intervention in a cancer hospital.

Objective To demonstrate economic impact of pharmaceutical evaluation in detection and prevention of errors in antineoplastic prescriptions. Methods This was an observational and retrospective study performed in a cancer hospital. From July to August 2016 pharmacists checked prescriptions of antineoplastic and adjuvant drugs. Drug-related problems observed were classified and analyzed concerning drug, pharmaceutical intervention, acceptability and characteristic of the error. In case of problem related to dose, we calculated a deviation percentage related with correct dose and value spent or saved. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics with frequency and percentage. Results A total of 6,104 prescriptions and 12,128 medications were evaluated. Drug-related problems were identified in 274 (4.5%) prescriptions. Most of them was due to lack of information (n=117; 36.1%). Problems associated with dose accounted for 32.1% (n=98) of the total. In 13 cases (13.3%) ranging of prescribed dose was 50% greater than the correct dose. Intercepted drug-related problems provided savings of R$54.081,01 and expenses of R$20.863,36, therefore resulting in a positive balance of R$33.217,65. Each intervention promoted saving of R$126,78 with an acceptance rate of 98%. Main pharmaceutical interventions were information inclusion (n=117; 36.1%) and dose change (n=97; 29.9%). All errors were classified as error with no harm. Conclusion Simple actions such as prescription checking are able to identify and prevent drug-related problems, avoid financial losses and add immeasurable value to patient safety.